Are Marvel movies getting old?

“I don’t see them. I tried, you know?” Martin Scorsese said in a 2019 interview with empire, “But this is not cinema.” The good comrades The director went on to compare the films to “theme parks” and questioned their depth. Needless to say, his comments sparked controversy. Some felt Scorsese’s comments were topical, while others thought he was out of line and unfair to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Scorsese isn’t the only prominent public figure Superhero movies denounced. Dune Director Denis Villeneuve described the Marvel films as “cut and paste,” saying, “These films may have turned us into a little zombie.” Legendary director The Godfather Francis Ford Coppola felt Scorsese was there Very cool. “He didn’t say he was vile, I just say he is.” Whew.

but now, 28 The movies are in, is it time to get along with these people? The common thread that ties these criticisms together is that the Marvel movies are the same boring movie over and over again. The hero gains powers, the hero becomes a hero, the hero meets the villain, continues to pay attention to the specific love and saves the situation. In many cases, it is difficult to disagree with the criticisms regarding the recurring narrative structure of these films.

Marvel films and narrative structure

One of the most reliable criticisms of the Marvel films is undoubtedly their structure. The repetition of narrative structures (such as those mentioned above) makes Marvel movies so predictable. For a start, we know the superhero whose name distinguishes the title of the movie no will die. especially When we know that the actor playing the superhero still has a contract to fulfill with Marvel. So, whatever happens, we know it [insert superhero’s name here] You will reach the end.

Now, you might think this is a trivial point. However, it is more important than you think. Ensuring the survival of the superhero (and several sequences) immediately omits a potential source of tension within the film’s narrative. I don’t judge this as good or bad – I just take it as fact. Superhero – and by extension, goods and privileges are Concentration – You need to keep saving the day. It goes.

But there is more! No matter how flawed a Marvel movie hero may be, they always – Always – Creatures are noble and boring as a result. Let’s take Ant-Man as an example. When Paul Rudd’s Scott Lang was initially introduced in his first 2015 movie, he just got out of prison. He’s a former systems engineer who has been sent away to embezzle money – wow, what an interesting past for this future hero! In fact, you might think so. However, it wasn’t long until the movie established that Scott was pulling “Robin Hood” – embezzling from the rich and giving to the poor.

The film immediately removes the complexity of Scott’s character. You see, one of Ant-Man’s dominant themes is “redemption,” which is what Scott Lang pursues through his paranormal activities throughout the film. However, the topic is immediately Devastating because the audience knows that Scott is a good, selfless guy deep down, anyway. In short, the movie is about “Breaking Good” – but Scott is a good guy with good intentions from the start. This lessens the impact of his growing up during the movie – and so, when Lang confronts his ex-wife and boyfriend (and assert, in various ways, that he’s a douche), we’re instantly on his side because we know otherwise.

Lots of comedy

Speaking of “bringing the audience to your side,” Marvel does this in other ways as well. One of the most important examples is comedy. Oftentimes, Marvel movies balance their action and drama with comedy to show us that, yes, even they are I know Their heroes are pretty silly, too. It almost limits the fourth wall (when not too frank).

Now, it’s easy to see why Marvel would do this. The comedy breaks the tension in some scenes, gives the audience endorphins, and in doing so overturns the dramatic expectations of the scene. And while this is often funny, the rate at which Marvel uses this technology can also limit intrusion (and predictable implementation). Doctor Strange’s final battle prep for his first movie made him wrestle fiercely with his anthropomorphic cloak, killing the buildup (and dangers) of battle. Avengers: Endgame Throw in kill-baby-Thanos jokes as the team actively seeks to defeat the creature who wiped out half the universe. Bruce Banner and the Hulk even chime in “Smart Hulk” in an effort to get some easy laughs from us.

And, repeatedly, I am stressed. Jokes are good most of the time. One can’t be grateful enough that Marvel didn’t go the other way – making their films serious to the point of bending (like Warner Bros’ Batman vs Superman). However, all too often, Marvel comics get in the way, when you should be on the side. For example, with the Hulk’s MCU performance, the intriguing Jekyll-Hyde dynamic is pushed aside in favor of cheap laughs and comedy. Chris Hemsworth’s Thor, initially a straight-faced Norse god, becomes Tony Stark 2.0’s spoof.

engraving and veil

But Marvel’s invasive humor isn’t the worst thing the movies are based on. Rather, it is their over-reliance on him engraving. And when movies rely on cameos and big moments, rather than arcs and generic themes, it becomes a problem.

We see the clearest downside to Marvel’s demanding fan service in Doctor Strange in a multiverse of madness. The “Illuminati” characters include Mr. Fantastic, Professor Xavier, Captain Carter, Carl Mordo, Black Bolt and Maria Rambo as an alternate universe of Captain Marvel. And yes, while it’s fun to see these familiar faces (Patrick Stewart as Xavier is especially beautiful), what do they add to the overall story? be honest.

It seems that the only reason these characters are in the movie is to target Wanda to show how strong she is. In fact, you make quick work of all the heroes mentioned above. But beyond that, they add nothing to the plot. You might argue that some of them (like John Krasinski’s Reed Richards) are there to prepare themselves for future MCU flicks. And that’s probably true – but it feels cheap because it serves up Marvel’s episodic nature rather than the movie on its own terms.

Marvel’s problem after the credits

Iron Man

Ironically, the episodic nature that Marvel movies are known for is their biggest problem. It’s no secret that the MCU is just a high-performance TV on a budget. In fact, it is their TV-like nature that makes them ideal for Disney Plus shows. It just fits well.

However, as mentioned earlier, the problem comes when the movies are just sequels designed to produce more sequels than they are complete films per se. iron man 2For example, a good movie – but not as good as a movie It could have been. his attempt to be an Iron Man movie while simultaneously trying to introduce Scarlett Johansson’s Black Widow. It’s as if the movie cares more about the setting Avengers From the embodiment of villains, Whiplash and Justin Hammer.

Now, the MCU is known for making use of post-credits scenes to tease future sequels and characters. They did this to great effect in building on the first Avengers. And recently, the end eternity It has been revealed that the seemingly ordinary boyfriend of Sersei (Jimma Chan), played by Kit Harrington, actually has a very strong background of his own despite his debut. We got the idea that his personality plays an important role in future movies. However, when the results we get are Marvel movies full of laughter and boring narration we now have, these scenes feel more like cheap marketing than good cinema. As such, it makes future releases less exciting than Kevin Feige thinks.


But that’s just our opinion. Do you think Marvel movies are getting old and boring? What changes would you like to see made?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *